Training by runtastic7/7/2023 ![]() Only subjects in the moderate and high response group increased their training velocity continuously along the 16 weeks of training. Results: Subjects allocated in the faster marathon performance group showed systematically higher training volume and higher shares of training at low intensities. Response and marathon performance groups were classified by the 33.3rd and 66.6th percentile of Δ v 10 and the marathon performance time, respectively. Training response was quantified by the improvement of the velocity of 10 km runs Δ v 10 between the first and last 4 weeks of the training period. Differences in training volume and intensity between three response and three marathon performance groups were analyzed. The analysis was performed on unsupervised fitness app data (Runtastic) from 6,771 marathon finishers. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of training responses during a 16 weeks training period prior to an absolved marathon. However, which training is most effective in terms of a performance improvement remains unclear. Current literature describes which training characteristics are related to marathon performance. Objective: Finishing a marathon requires to prepare for a 42.2 km run.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |